Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Character

It’s been a long time since I last added to this blog.  So long, in fact, that I considered just shutting it down!  It seems that there is no greater sin in the blogosphere than to be dormant.  It’s not as if we have been quiet.  Since making the last post, I have given 20 or so speeches, written an article for the U.S. Naval Institute’s PROCEEDINGS magazine (the magazine that contains our Navy’s intellectual dialogue, and one I HIGHLY recommend), and have made several trips around the Force.  So now that I’m back, I thought that I’d share some thoughts I’ve had since I last posted.
I’ve been talking to the Submarine Force about two things:
 
-              Building depth – training and mentoring our future submarine force
 
-              The importance of Character in what we do

I’d like to discuss Character in this post and come back to ‘building depth’ in a later post.
SAN DIEGO (March 26, 2012) Vice Adm. John M. Richardson,
commander of Submarine Forces, addresses senior members of the
submarine community in the San Diego area during a khaki call at
the Submarine Learning Center Detachment, San Diego.
The brief highlighted the character and integrity present
in the submarine community.
Our character – our moral and ethical quality - is hard-wired to the success of our mission as a Navy, and particularly as naval leaders.  From my standpoint, we need to pay particular attention to this in the submarine Force.  Let me explain…
Our submarine force offers an important, unique contribution to our navy and our nation: we have a significant hard and soft kill payload that can go to sea and stay undetected for months at a time.  We can and do go anywhere in the world and operate independently without logistic support or communications – truly self-sustaining.  We are independent and invisible, providing our nation’s decision-makers with a wide range of options; most notably, a non-provacative platform that can quietly inform diplomacy one day, and then enforce it the next.  Invisibility and independence are advantages that are critical to our mission. 
But our advantage comes with responsibility.  In order to maintain the trust and confidence of our leaders and Sailors, we must constantly be assessing, correcting, and improving ourselves.  We must get underway, and left largely to our own devices, return stronger than when we left.
Invisibility and character have a long relationship, and it hasn’t always been a healthy one.  Being out of sight can uniquely challenge one’s character.  This is not a new idea.  In the Second Book of the Republic, written around 400 BC, Plato describes the challenge of the Ring of Gyges – a ring that will make its wearer invisible.    From The Republic:
  • Suppose now that there were two such magic rings, and the just put on one of them and the unjust the other; no man can be imagined to be of such an iron nature that he would stand fast in justice. No man would keep his hands off what was not his own when he could safely take what he liked out of the market, or go into houses and lie with any one at his pleasure, or kill or release from prison whom he would, and in all respects be like a god among men.
  • Then the actions of the just would be as the actions of the unjust; they would both come at last to the same point.  — Plato's Republic, 360b-d (Jowett trans.)
Plato surmised that we are moral because we must be – and that left unchecked by society’s eye, we’d devolve to a state of low morality, of low character.  Beyond Plato and several examples in mythology (think Gollum in Tolkein’s Lord of the Rings), there is plenty of evidence to support this proposition.  One only need consider the more recent examples of the Stanford Prison Experiment in 1971 or the abuses of Abu Ghraib prison in 2004-2006, both of which had elements of “invisibility,” to find examples of the degeneration of character that can occur when you think no one is looking. In short, Plato may have been on to something. 
The Navy has been interested in the study of character, and its relation to being out of sight, for a long time – in fact the Stanford Prison Experiment mentioned above was funded by the Office of Naval Research.  It makes sense – ships are on their own, out of sight – exhibiting some of the same elements that can lead to the sort of trouble that Plato talked about almost 2500 years ago.  Even within the ships themselves there are opportunities for this “out of sight” behavior.  Submarines even more so.  If we think about instances of hazing, they often occur in areas of the ship that have been allowed to become remote – out of the normal ship’s circulation and not visited often enough by supervision.  They become “sanctuaries” for outrageous behavior.  One important ingredient for eliminating hazing and other outrageous and undesirable behavior is to eliminate these out of the way, “invisible” sanctuaries. 
Polls routinely show that the military usually ranks at or near the top of any list of institutions when it comes to the confidence of our citizens.  That’s proper and just – they desperately believe that those defending this country, those willing to go into harm’s way for us and for other nations, are our most honorable.  When we military leaders fall short in character, it shakes the foundation of the standard against which all others are measured - it’s front page news, and that should be no surprise.  It’s a violation of the trust placed in us to take care of the sons and daughters, brothers and sisters, fathers and mothers that America sends to our care.
Any claim to leadership we have is founded on the trust and confidence that our Sailors, and the American People, have in us.  It’s only possible to have that foundation if our leadership has strong character – strong moral courage.  We KNOW what’s right, and we have the strength to DO what’s right.  And furthermore, we have the responsibility – it’s our charge of command – to develop strong character in our subordinates, to build depth in our Navy now and into the future.
We’re not perfect.  In the Submarine Force we’ve had some high-visibility lapses in character.  You’ve read about them: the cheating incident on USS MEMPHIS, the fraternization between the Chief of the Boat and a female midshipman on USS NEBRASKA, an incident of hazing on USS FLORIDA, and the financial misconduct of some Supply Officers in Kings Bay.  In each case, once discovered, these incidents were thoroughly investigated, and appropriate people were held accountable.  This is our approach and we’ll continue to address these cases swiftly and decisively. 
The discussion on these cases has been vigorous in the media and the blogosphere.  I frequently take questions about these incidents when I travel – people want to know how this can possibly happen.  To so many, it just doesn’t check…it’s so out of whack with their expectations, and feels so personal and close to home.  A violation by one seems to be a violation against all.  Again, we can’t be surprised by these feelings or the questions that come with them.  Indeed we owe an explanation and we must participate in these discussions.  Most of the substance of the media reports comes from the report of our own investigations that we release in response to Freedom of Information Act requests.  And if we learn legitimate new information from these discussions in the media, we explore each new revelation until we have as complete a picture as possible.
Together with the rest of the Navy, Submarine Force leadership will continue to stress the importance of character in our force, and in particular our leaders.  There is currently a vigorous and growing discussion of this throughout the force – that’s exactly how it should be.  We need to take every opportunity to make character – our moral and ethical quality – not something exclusively academic but something we talk about directly every day.  It should be part of our conversations in wardrooms and chief’s quarters.  It should be discussed up front at our operational briefs – the importance of keeping our integrity intact.  In this way, we make every evolution we do a leadership laboratory, a source of strength. 
SOUDA BAY, Greece (June 13, 2012) The Los Angeles-class attack
submarine USS Annapolis (SSN 760) gets underway
from Souda harbor following a port visit. Annapolis is
homeported in Groton, Conn., and is on a scheduled
deployment in the U.S. 6th Fleet area of responsibility.

The Submarine Force is one of our nation’s true stealth forces.  We get much of our strength from being invisible for long periods of time.  To do this successfully, we must recognize the challenge that this poses and take every opportunity to make each other morally and ethically stronger – to strengthen the bond of trust and confidence we have within our Force and with our nation.  Our best people – our Sailors – deserve nothing less.

 
Semper Procinctum
VADM John M. Richardson
Commander, Submarine Force

15 comments:

  1. Don't shut the blog down! The boats themselves must be Silent, but their commander need not be. Nice post.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well spoken. The success, or failure, of our missions at sea depend on the integrity of each Sailor and Officer to carry out their assigned tasks as we train to and as we expect. It is about personal character and hard-earned moral courage by which we are known - the Submariner.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Also well written...from a retired DOD Contractor working with the sub service for over 44 years and from a qualified STS5(SS)submariner with 6 years of service...the understanding of the relationship between invisibility (need-to-know) and character is what this country needs now...Good Job! Bravo Zulu! HOOYAH!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sir, the standards that must be up-held by enlisted and commissioned Submarine Force leaders should stand in understanding of Plato's words but also in defiance. The Submarine Leader must be able to stand in the face of all temptations, without fear of reprisal or oversight, and still do not only his duty but go beyond at all times. They must set the example that all actions should be for the good of the Force and selfish acts have no place in our world. Only with such standards will we return the Force to the pillar it should reside. Where we set the example for all those in Service and restore honor to the word SUBMARINER!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. VADM J.M. RichardsonJune 20, 2012 at 5:45 PM

      You are right!! I was using Plato to show the challenge that faces us, not as an example for us to emulate. You said it more clearly than I did - let's stand in defiance of Plato's prediction and uphold the high standards of character that should define our Submarine Force!

      thanks for a great post. JMR

      Delete
    2. VADM J.M. RichardsonJune 20, 2012 at 5:48 PM

      Hey and one more thing - a Submariner is as honorable as it gets. Don't let anybody tell you different.

      JMR

      Delete
    3. Admiral,

      Thank you for your response and consideration.

      While I agree that being "a Submariner is as honorable as it gets," we've never held ourselves to an example of another community. We have; however, slipped from the example of our past brothers which we do hold ourselves to.

      While confused in mist of modernization and applauding accomplishments like lower DUIs and liberty incidents, we've strayed from core concepts such as: leading from the lowest level possible and the responsible delegation of power down the Chain of Command. These characteristics of the Submarine Force past is what turned-out some of the most desirable leaders in our Nation's history. Their loss has resulted in Submariners making Chief or becoming an XO and then having to learning how to lead. Like leadership skills, character takes time to build. They must be forged slowly over years and are grown together. One set compliments and provides strength to the other. Now that we're micromanaging from the top, showing no respect to our junior leaders and affording them less opportunities to make mistakes, learn, and forge their own characters; we're suffering issues related to the lost of our organization's ethos. If we want to rebuild our character we must first address the factors that have damaged it.

      Very Respectfully,

      Delete
  5. Admiral,

    As the Commanding Officer who was on watch when the cheating issue in MEMPHIS was discovered - and was held accountable for it - I can't agree more with your discussion of the central importance of character.

    I offer two related observations:

    With the heavy tasking that our crews face each day, there is a natural tendency for individuals to prioritize their tasks, to put their main effort on the tasks that they feel are the most important and to look for ways to accomplish the tasks that they consider to be low-priority in an expedient manner. For some, this leads to cutting corners. I encourage submarine leaders to ensure that the tasks that they assign to their team have actual value in relation to achieving the ship’s mission, that they explain (and explain again!) this value to their team, and that they ensure the workload assigned is reasonably achievable. Taking these steps will help your team align their efforts and standards with your expectations.

    I fully agree that invisibility can test a person’s character. Good leaders must have the self-discipline to stay true to principles. Leaders must also help their team stay true to principles through positive example, communication and action - and by ensuring that the crew knows that there are no invisible areas on your boat. Potential invisible areas on a boat have always included "closed door" divisions, remote machinery spaces and the midwatch. Now that information systems have become pervasive to every facet of submarining, submarine leaders should consider the ship's LAN to be another potentially invisible area that should be closely monitored.

    Very respectfully,
    C. H. Maher
    CDR, USN

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. VADM J.M. RichardsonJune 21, 2012 at 3:17 PM

      CDR Maher, thanks for your input.

      Delete
  6. Admiral,

    Certainly appreciate the thoughtful discussion on the importance of character in what we do. It is the centerpiece of trust for everyone in a leadership position.

    In true submarine fashion, my concern would be more discussion of "why" character has become such an acute concern in our Force and in our Navy. I see at least two root causes: 1) the lack of moral compass and 2)new standards and expectations for behavior,

    The moral fiber of our society is fraying and we as a nation are less willing to allow Judeo-Christian values to be the framework for our moral and ethical behavior. While I personally think that is an unfortunate development, it is a fact. Our society has continued to push for greater separation between church and state. This has led to acceptance of what many, in fact most, religions view as immoral behavior being condoned by the military. If religous beliefs are an underpinning of our likelihood to do the right thing, what should we replace those religious beliefs with in order to orient our moral compass? For example, our Navy will not allow adultery because it is immoral (and has been the basis for several of these firings) so why will we allow homosexual activity as it is also considered immoral. I'm not advocating one or the other, but we can't have our cake (expect moral decisions) and have it too (condone immoral behavior).

    The standards and expectations of Commanding Officer behavior have also changed. Any submariner with >15 years in can certainly recount many a blind eye turned when a CO was in an extramarital affair, involved in an alcohol related incident, or when a nuclear continued training exam was compromised. I'm glad we have come to a time in our Force when we are ready to take on those problems head on, but let's not fool ourselves into thinking that this type of behavior never existed before. Be willing to say, there is a new standard and what you who are serving as COs and XOs saw when you were young is wholly unacceptable.

    An unintended consequence now is that CO firings generate national headlines with immediate CNO level engagement. This is allowing poor performing COs to remain in place as we have already drawn so much attention to the performance of our selected leaders. Will we continue to have the courage to replace these weak leaders in the face of certain criticism from above?

    Let's drive this discussion to what we are going to fundamentally do different to develop and select leaders. 360 reviews are a start, but until their results are used in selection boards they are just interesting experiments in feedback.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Admiral,

    I couldn't agree more and I couldn't agree less with you.

    Did we haze people on the USS Dace? You're damn right we did! And for good reason.

    We hazed guys to test their ability to withstand STRESS.

    Hazing eliminated those who couldn't stand the heat, so we got them out of the kitchen for our and their own safety.

    It was the mutual-assured-destruction hazing that brought and kept the crew tight. We never caused anyone physical injury. It was verbal and situational. We would insult each other in the most vile ways possible and then we would sit back and mentally grade the other guy during his rebuttal on his choice of words, ability to not repeat himself, body language, technical merit, artistic interpretation and poetic technique while he was delivering his diatribe. Meanwhile, we would be looking for some infinitesimal chink in his armor and attack that, knowing we were also going to be graded to the same standards. It was one-upmanship at its finest.

    Hazing stresses are the most inconsequential precursor to the stresses of a real war. If you can't stand a little hazing, then you're going to end up as a limp sack of whimpering tears when the depth charges go off and the ocean starts invading the people tank and I DON'T WANT YOU ON MY BOAT WHEN THAT HAPPENS!!

    I REFUSE to ever apologize for the daily crap I gave my fellow bubbleheads.

    I REFUSE to ask for an apology from those whose raked me over the coals.

    I thank my lucky stars that I had the members of the 1975-1978 USS DACE crew, the finest hazers in the world, preparing me to save lives.

    I got it, I gave it, and I'm proud of it.

    You, sir, are correct in that, CHARACTER is everything on a boat. We simply didn't have the luxury of being able to wait for the REAL stress of war to discover who had it and who didn't.

    Dan Quinn ET1(SS), USS DACE SSN 607 (1975-1978)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. VADM J.M. RichardsonJuly 2, 2012 at 6:53 AM

      ET1(SS) Quinn,

      My post was focused on the importance of character, but since you brought up hazing, let me make two points.

      First, regarding hazing:

      Hazing does NOT make people stronger, it makes them weaker. It subtracts from top performance. Hazing erodes the skills, trust, and confidence upon which top performing teams thrive.

      It is personal and demeaning, attacking a person’s human dignity. There are no “teachers” and “students” with hazing, only “attackers” and “victims.” It degrades the character of both the attacker and victim.

      Hazing is destructive. I’ll continue to strive to eliminate destructive behavior in our Navy and Submarine Force – to drive it to zero. There is no gray area here.


      Second, regarding building strength and toughness:

      The nation expects us to mold our young people to perform effectively under stress – including the stress of combat. There are many ways to increase performance under stress that are constructive, and better simulate the conditions we face while operating, including in combat.

      I’ll work with the other leaders in the Submarine Force to continue to employ and refine a qualification and training system that develops superior performance, including performance under stress. An approach that hones individuals and teams, using the most sophisticated and informed methods for developing high performance and high morale together. Methods that are sustainable and rewarding for everybody who joins.

      Since our beginning, including the Cold War generation to which you belonged, we Submariners have taken on the toughest challenges – tough missions against capable threats in harsh environments – and come out on top.

      We’re not taking it easy out there – we’re building on the professional foundation we inherited and are trying to be smart about how we become strong. By using this approach, we’re stronger today than ever before.

      Delete
  8. I have really enjoyed reading your posts, Sir. It is always good to hear from you. Please don't shut the blog down!

    Very respectfully,
    MIDN Dickerman

    ReplyDelete
  9. Admiral -

    I found this blog by way of an announcement on your selection for NR. Congratulations on both accounts -- your promotion AND your words depicted above.

    I am a retired FA-18 driver so my background is far afield from others that have joined the conversation. Your call to strength and moral character extend well beyond those that graciously sail King Neptune's realm -- they apply to everyday life regardless of job (or not), position (or not) and stature (or not). Thusly, I am sending your post to all I know, family and friends, so they can draw their own parallels to their lives and determine living, and living right.

    Thanks again, Birdog CDR USN (Ret)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. VADM J.M. RichardsonJuly 15, 2012 at 10:54 PM

      Thanks for the kind words Birdog. I'm glad you enjoyed the post and I hope your friends do too.

      Delete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.